Lies, Liars & the appeasers

This week has seen the culmination of a very long, very lengthy trial costing us the taxpayers in region of £5m pounds!

I am unable to comment on the person who was found guilty on one count & may well possibly face a retrial due to a certain person who should have known better! The concept of subjudicy appears to have escaped pone who should know better but of course the MSM too!

They have hounded, harangued & essentially, I could well be argued, put themselves & a certain person who is at the top of the political monkey puzzle tree; in a position to force a possible retrial or as is very likely to happen a complete vindication on 2 of the 3 charges they were being tried for!

So this £5m show trial has a scapegoat BUT the person found guilty of the first act is likely never to have to face any further criminal proceedings on 2 other very important & serious charges.

So the media have their sacrificial lamb but he won’t be sacrificed in the usual way he is likely to limp around the field with one of those little wheelchair harnesses for his back legs! So no likely he’ll face no prison time due to the actions of a former employer! Hack on Tag – possibly a new column in the Phoenix from the ashes “News Of The World”!

All of this sorry & distasteful costly trial could have been better used to get rid of the Under Occupancy Charge, sanctions on disabled people, big families caught in benefit cap (it shouldn’t have been retrospective as the children already exist & they will be the ones to suffer) and/or any manner of things. It would also have been better remaining, for the most part, in the Budget for Criminal Justice or better known as Legal Aid. So many people now do not qualify & are unrepresented in court! As happened to an octogenarian accused of murder in the past few weeks!

so much for the great work done by Garrow a few centuries ago which instead of assisting the accused to fight their case; it appears now to be sadly returning to the style of justice often portrayed in period dramas.

Sorry about that side step, as you regular readers will no doubt know I am a bit of an Anorak on certain things.

Back to the ex-employee of extremely high standing who could have possibly used his contacts or lists of who is who to seek out information which may or may not have allowed them access to the personal telephone number of others working in the same “Mother of All P_R_I_M_N_T’s” (bit of an easy crossword to break up the monotony of Sudoku – play on again now) whom they could hack then more easily? It’s possible, don’t you think??

Now back to our very prominent person, whom is disliked in all of the EU countries including the UK. Yesterday he knowingly gave an interview about how he had been taken in by this Swiss Tony of Fleet Street, given him a 2nd chance (wasn’t aware he’d been previously been caught, cautioned or indeed prosecuted when asked to do the job he did inside 10 Downing Street). It shows such people & an associated agencies (Not in an outside manner) in their true colours!

However, this interview has basically been given and has thus automatically has scuppered any chance of getting a “fair trial”! Or indeed a retrial! Funny how things pan out when your sibling is the Counsel for one of the accused, one could jump to conclusions of words possibly said over Sunday Lunch but we wouldn’t do such a thing because we mere functionaries and taxpayers wouldn’t dare think such a thing and if we did we know better than to comment.

I shall leave you to the inevitable media scrum or three to make your own views. For this is my mere 2p’s worth and no doubt some will likely reply saying it’s not worth tuppence, I take such “constructive criticism” with the pinch of salt each deserves by the rate of salt collection I dare say will keep my path free of snow for a while in the winter months.

20140626-074846-28126808.jpg

20140626-074847-28127046.jpg

20140626-074847-28127128.jpg

20140626-074901-28141845.jpg

20140626-074901-28141750.jpg

20140626-074902-28142001.jpg

20140626-074901-28141927.jpg

The Don’t Care System coming to a town near you

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/elderhealth/10882025/Fine-print-of-care-rules-could-screen-out-frail-elderly-and-disabled-charities-warn.html

I have started the blog with a link because I have been notified of the contents within which will affect the lives of many people with disabilities, older people with degenerative illnesses & basically anyone who needs a little bit of help to live independently.

What is it that the Government don’t like about the ill, the frail, the elderly, people with disabilities because over the past 4 years they have systematically changed things to ensure that the most vulnerable in our supposed caring society are penalised for all societies ill.

I’m appalled at the way these new regulations can be interpreted and that is the real problem. Each person in charge of the Adult Services & Community Support all over the country can interpret things to suit their ever decreasing budgets. Councillors award the budget to the departments & then they “dole” it out to those who most likely shout loudest!

Who will shout for those who are to scared to shout? Who will care for those our society doesn’t wishes to leave alone? Who will help those who cannot help themselves?

I am deeply saddened by this but I promise no matter what I will speak out, I will shout for the help, I will care about those Society does not. Who will stand with me & do the same for the people of their communities?

I hope there will be legions who will hear my call to arms & defend those who are most vulnerable!

Respond below & pledge your allegiance to help in your neighbourhood. If enough of us do a little bit each then it will change many lives for the better!

Thanks for reading.

20140606-214407-78247151.jpg

20140606-214408-78248975.jpg

20140606-214408-78248654.jpg

20140606-214408-78248541.jpg

20140606-214409-78249214.jpg

20140606-214409-78249057.jpg

20140606-214408-78248775.jpg

20140606-214408-78248883.jpg

20140606-214406-78246895.jpg

20140606-214408-78248413.jpg

20140606-214409-78249294.jpg

20140606-214409-78249147.jpg

20140606-214409-78249504.jpg

20140606-214409-78249384.jpg

PayPal Scam – Please Share

Just received this supposedly from PayPal – it’s a scam. Luckily my firewall protected me so I had time to check into it.

I don’t use or have Skype so was very suspicious. If you receive the following, report it as phishing e-mail & do not give your details; they don’t even have PayPal as it should appear there is a space between the Pay and the Pal: see below;

You sent a payment of 44.99 GBP to Skype (support@skype.com)
Merchant
Skype
support@skype.com
Instructions to merchant
You haven’t entered any instructions.
Shipping address – Unconfirmed
United Kingdom
Postage details
The seller hasn’t provided any postage details yet.
Description Unit price Qty Amount
Online Number, 3 month subscription
44.99 GBP 1 44.99 GBP
Subtotal 44.99 GBP
Total 44.99 GBP

If you haven’t authorized this charge, open a dispute at:
https://www.paypal.com/Dispute_Centre/webscr?cmd=xpt

Please share this so others don’t get stung.

Thanks

20140512-105957.jpg

20140512-110004.jpg

20140512-110010.jpg

20140512-110015.jpg

20140512-110024.jpg

20140512-110031.jpg

Cameron’s Referendum Script

Over the past few weeks I have watched and listened very carefully to the words of David Cameron, Manuel Barrosso and a plethora of Pro EU commentators.

It appears from listening to the real syntax of David Cameron’s statements about the 2017 In/out Referendum Promise is a mere advertising puff (as we say in the legal world). Sadly this is a promise that will ONLY happen IF the following all happen in the next 3 years;

1). IF the Tories win a Majority in 2015
2). IF there can be renegotiation with the EU
3). IF the renegotiation brings about changes to our membership
4). IF the renegotiations bring about Treaty changes
5). IF the renegotiations give more power to the EU

Then and Only then will Cameron and Co give the British People a chance of actually having a say about our country.

This is a conditional promise and he uses his words very carefully, please watch and listen carefully to him and you will see his main prepared sentence is {and I paraphrase} If I am Prime Minister after 2015 then I will set about renegotiating our relationship with the EU, if I am successful in those renegotiations then of course the British People must have a vote on whether they want to stay in or out of the EU based on the renegotiations I achieve.

Now to most people that means he will give a referendum in 2017 but we are in 2014 why is he not starting those talks now? Why is he still saying that no matter the result of the renegotiations that if there is a Referendum he will campaign to stay in! Sorry but that really isn’t the way to start off any renegotiation. Your stance must be we want this, this and this OR we leave. That is the basis is negotiations, you start high and meet at a level whereby you gain a the most for the people or company you represent. It is the old case of bartering, something most British people are not comfortable with.

So he has handed the upper hand to the EU, Barrosso has stated that he wants to see the UK stay in the EU, he has said there may be a small set of policy areas where the UK could possibly be allowed to have a few concessions. He has said many times that there WILL NOT be any treaty renegotiations and the concessions that may be on offer are minor. So that’s it really. The deal has been done by playing on words, just as he and his crew trot out every time about the “cast iron guarantee”. He states that his guarantee in 2009 was only if the Lisbon Treaty had not been signed. The Tories often tell us that there cannot be a referendum in retrospect, what complete rot! The referendum held on June 5th 1975 was in relation the Economic Communities Act AFTER the UK had joined the EEC. We have not had any say whatsoever in the last 39 years regarding the treaties which took us deeper in to a political union creating a type of Federal State. One could describe it is conquest via stealth!

So please remember Cameron is a slippery fish not to dissimilar to Mr Bliar! His words are measured and controlled to always give him the YES BUT CLAUSE so he is able to get out of the pie crust promises, easily made and easily broken.

So if you decide to vote for the Tories based on that so called promise then you are being conned by the Con’s! Please feel free to check out what I have said regarding the Referendum promise, look for the ifs, buts, maybes and other conditions and then make your mind up.

No party is perfect, none have all perfect people in, they are made of human beings and in some parties the way they can entice votes on a promise to deliver something and renege on them is a very well practised art. They learn at the feet of ministers during their move from University to being an intern, then special adviser, then MP.

It is part of the training, which is good in some ways because you do need people of knowledge to be in the Government and Parliament BUT you also need people with real life experience, of business, of work, of all areas of life to be in the House of Commons.

Only with people from a wider pool can we get a parliament that really represents the population and who will speak in plain simple language without putting all the ifs and buts used as conjunctives in order to deceive the people.

So be very careful and listen intently so you can pick out the “conditional” parts of the statements made by Mr Cameron, Mr Clegg and Mr Miliband.

Those of you who have heard, seen and watched Mr Farage and his UKIP People’s Army will note he does not use the covert conditions hidden in his responses to any of the questions he is asked. He will say it as it is, like of or not he doesn’t spend 10 minutes spewing out words that when analysed really mean nothing at all, to much hot air is blown by such MP’s.

So the choice is as ever yours, it is your vote, it is up to you to use it in a way that you think will bring about the best for you and your family. If you refuse to vote then don’t complain about the Government, Council and EU elected people because you didn’t cast a vote. However, for those who do vote then I hope that the outcome is something that will be good for all of us in the UK.

20140509-132121.jpg

20140509-132136.jpg

20140509-132148.jpg

20140509-132213.jpg

20140509-132232.jpg

20140509-132325.jpg

20140509-132414.jpg

20140509-132537.jpg

20140509-132614.jpg

20140509-132711.jpg

Is the economy picking up? No the a Deficit is Rising Every more Highly!

Below is an Extract from The Times: it makes very interesting reading. The past few weeks we have been told how the Housing Market is picking up even at first time buyer levels.

The books are starting to balance and the deficit is reducing. The deficit is a humongous debt! To measure it they see what money has come in & compare it to how much they borrow! The national Debt is therefore growing.

All of these things aren’t explained to the people. The Political big wigs use their jargon & quite frankly huge dollops of BS to hoodwink us into thinking times are changing! Funny it happens in the final 7 weeks to an election?

The truth is what the Treasury gets in from our combined taxes is amount A. The amount borrowed every month/quarter is B so if in March the country took more in under A then the need to borrow less B = deficit shrinking!

It’s an odd one I grant you so look it it as this;

A = tax revenue paid in;
B = amount borrowed (Deficit)
C = amount needed to pay Bills
D = the interest added to B
E = the money owed by the country.

We only ever hear about A and B – the deficit but we never hear anything of C, D or E! Why not? they don’t want us to know how big the debt it is .

So every month that passes it really is the case the the money paid out is more than what we take in as tax.

In any Business this would honestly be a mega shambles & the business would go bust. It’s that simple & we are not told the truth in plain, easy language. Instead thy use 500 words that mean beggar all & keep up the pretence!

So remember when they talk about the deficit reducing it isn’t the full story! It may appear smaller than that of the previous months BUT it does not mean the country is actually getting back on its feet!

Below as promised the article from the times. If anyone has any questions please just ask.

Please note the pictures aren’t very exciting but I think you’ll see a huge difference from the previous Chancellors and Mr Osborne’s now. Happy reading 😉⭐️♿️

National current account slides deeper into deficit

Saturday 29th March 2014

Britain’s ability to pay its way in the world has hit an all-time low, raising fresh fears for the economy despite signs that its long-awaited rebalancing towards investment and trade has begun.
The country’s current account slumped to a record deficit at the end of last year as income on British investments overseas crashed. Economists said that the decline could put the pound under pressure and sap growth over the longer term.
The Office for National Statistics revealed that the deficit in the final three months of 2013 was 5.4 per cent of GDP as it revised down its third-quarter estimate to 5.6 per cent, making them the worst two quarters on record.
Analysts blamed decline on the appreciation of sterling and slow growth in economies where the UK is invested, such as the eurozone.
The deterioration was all on the income side of the account as the trade deficit narrowed from 2.5 per cent to 1.4 per cent between the third and fourth quarters. For 2013, the current account deficit was 4.4 per cent, the worst since the peak of the 1989 boom.
To balance the books, Britain has become increasingly reliant on huge financial inflows from overseas, which Samuel Tombs, of Capital Economics, said were fuelling “existing concerns that the UK’s recovery is too dependent on unsustainable sources”.
Foreign purchases
of UK shares, companies and houses in London, as well as other investments last year, offset the £71 billion paid in dividends and profits paid from Britain to overseas.
Rob Wood, an economist at Berenberg Bank, warned that Britain was “storing up big problems for the future” and said that authorities may need to “aim for slower domestic growth in order to erode the imbalances that are building up”.
Simon Wells, UK economist at HSBC, said: “If the income account continues to deteriorate, the UK could find it harder to sustain its persistent trade deficit. Eventually, this could mean that lower sterling and slower growth may be needed.”
Despite mounting longer-term fears about the current account, the immediate economic outlook appeared to improve. The ONS confirmed that the economy had grown by 0.7 per cent in its third estimate of growth for the final three months of last year, but the details showed that trade and investment were the two largest contributors.
Trade added 1 per cent to growth and investment 0.3 per cent, compared with household consumption, which contributed 0.2 per cent. That was offset by a 0.8 per cent decline in inventories.
“It is good news that growth was better balanced in the fourth quarter, with a fall in the trade deficit and an increase in business investment,” David Kern, chief economist at the British Chambers of Commerce, said.
The profitability of companies also improved, rising 5.4 per cent in the quarter and 4.8 per cent compared with last year.
The Chancellor is pinning his hopes for the recovery on businesses finally spending on new facilities, equipment and research to boost the real economy. The ONS revised its estimate of annual business investment in the fourth quarter from 8.5 per cent to 8.7 per cent.
“The detailed data revisions were favourable,” Mr Wood said. “The contribution of inventories was lowered considerably and net trade is now estimated to have bounced back from the disastrous third-quarter performance. Together that suggests less risk to growth through 2014.”

20140330-073408.jpg

20140330-073417.jpg

20140330-073426.jpg

20140330-073435.jpg

20140330-073442.jpg

Hapless Harriet and the Regretful Vile PIE

What a week it has been for poor old right on doogooder & professional moaner #HarrietHarman and it’s ONLY Tuesday!

From the Guardian

Well even the usual left wing supporting newspapers and now at last the Main 24 hour News channels are running this every 15 minutes or so. The terrestrial channels BBC, ITV, C4 and C5.

The interviews Ms Harman has consented to have been completely compelling because of her ridiculously regrettable rhetoric. As ever she has fallen into her well versed but her completely and utterly inappropriate diversion tactics clone mantra speak where the answer to every question is what she has attempted to practice. She could only regret this or that, she could only say that #PIE never affected any of her work at the #NCCL. Sorry Harriet it’s NOT working, how about the truth? I know it’s not something that comes easy to you but if you continue on this path it will heavily backfire.

Oooops it’s far to late it is backfiring spectacularly, I expect to see many more documents dredged from the Archives with your name on them.

I will now post a few articles from the media do read them.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2568232/Harman-Hewitt-never-tried-kick-didnt-want-rock-boat-protect-careers-claims-child-abuser-ex-leader-Paedophile-Information-Exchange.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2567329/Call-apology-Harriet-Harman-Labours-deputy-leader-expresses-regret-civil-liberties-groups-links-paedophile-lobby.html

There’s no crusade Tom Watson MP won’t join especially if standing against something will win him votes! scoundrel

http://twitter.com/star_pumpkin/status/438481806841905152/photo/1

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/25/harriet-harman-daily-mail-smear-inept

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26333558

https://twitter.com/liz727/status/438475514928709633

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/harriet-harman-pie-nccl-controversy-what-was-paedophile-information-exchange-1437862

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10659100/Harriet-Harman-Jack-Dromey-Patricia-Hewitt-and-the-Paedophile-Information-Exchange.html

The Telegraph
Tom O’Carroll, PIE’s founder and described as a “sexually predatory” paedophile, was put one of the Council’s working groups, and in spring 1977 he was allowed to make a speech at the Council’s spring conference. During this period, the Council stepped in to defend paedophiles against “hysterical and inaccurate” newspaper attacks. One leaflet sent by PIE to MPs claimed: “Paedophiles are ordinary, decent, sensible human beings, no more sexually depraved than yourself, and with a capacity for loving and helping children which is at present being repressed.” The organisation also submitted a report to MPs claiming that “girls as young as four months can achieve orgasm”, and that four-year-old children can “communicate verbally their consent to sex”.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26320942

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/harriet-harman-fails-to-answer-charges-over-historic-involvement-in-paedophile-rights-campaigns-according-to-daily-mail-9150429.html

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/labour-partys-paedogeddon-theyre-never-3182595j

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10661251/New-evidence-casts-doubt-on-Harriet-Harmans-defence-over-paedophile-links.html

This is a very serious issue, if the officers of any group cannot or do not expel affiliate groups then one can only say they acted in concert with each other!

Their silence by way of not reporting self confessed Paedophiles to the police is implying acceptance of the groups objectives.

Footage from the late 1970’s shown on #Newsnight shows that the people were aware of what #PIE where all about because there were demonstrations, name calling & shouting at the known paedophiles so if the public knew then Dromey, Harman, Hewitt knew.

Let’s see what happens in the next 24 hours. I cannot understand why Ed Miliband has publicly supported her in this.

It says to me they will turn a blind eye to extreme and vile views if it suits their ends but will scream from the rooftops demanding select committees, transparency, answers, why was it allowed to happen. It seems that it’s your turn to explain yourselves as to WHY you did not expel #PIE or indeed why in 1975 they were allowed to become affiliate members?

Is this all tied up with Operation Yewtree? If not why not?

I hope the people will look at all the reports & evidence to decide what they believe or don’t believe about this issue.

20140226-021308.jpg

20140226-021322.jpg

20140226-021330.jpg

20140226-021338.jpg

20140226-021347.jpg

20140226-021400.jpg

20140226-021413.jpg

20140226-021435.jpg

Senior Labour MP’s In Paedophile Information Exchange Row

In the past couple of days there has been number stories in the Daily Mail, front page and then more on the inner pages today. It has also been on the Website of Guido Fawkes regarding Labour Party Grandees Harman, Dromey and Hewitt who have been involved since the 1970’s with campaigns to reduce the age of consent amongst other things.

It has not gone unnoticed that these are the only media outlets to be bringing this vital and important information to the people. How can any person let alone MP’s campaign and condone the actions of #predatoryPaedophiles or actively campaign for the age of consent to be brought down to 14?

Not one mention on BBC, ITV, C4, C5, Sky etc live news programmes. How can a Cllrs odd views on flooding be more newsworthy than Three of #Labour’s Front Benchers being involved in campaigning to reduce the age of consent?

The BBC on 24th February reported this matter and Newsnight did a rather good interview in which Ms Harman did her best to deflect any responsibility for her hand in the affiliates of the NCCL. I do expect more news coverage in the coming days and weeks. It is not any form of smear campaign or witch hunt it is the truth & it is for this reason that Ms Harman et al will not be bringing an libel actions on any media outlet

As recently as 2009 #Harman was proposing a reduction in the age of consent to 14. She had worked for the NCCL in the late 1970’s for a good 3 or 4 years as their Legal Advisor! She Lobbied politicians and campaigned for rights of Paedophiles. Some of the campaigns were so stomach churning I am not going to detail them here but have attached a lot of the links I found in a few minutes and I would urge you to read the reports yourself.

As a mother of a daughter I am appalled, as the mother of sons I am appalled, as a human being I am appalled, as the child who was sexually abused I am scared.

I am appalled, sickened, upset, angry and incandescent with rage, that anyone could ever countenance there ever being a time when it would ever be appropriate for an adult to have have any form of SEXUAL CONTACT WITH A CHILD!