Lies, Liars & the appeasers

This week has seen the culmination of a very long, very lengthy trial costing us the taxpayers in region of £5m pounds!

I am unable to comment on the person who was found guilty on one count & may well possibly face a retrial due to a certain person who should have known better! The concept of subjudicy appears to have escaped pone who should know better but of course the MSM too!

They have hounded, harangued & essentially, I could well be argued, put themselves & a certain person who is at the top of the political monkey puzzle tree; in a position to force a possible retrial or as is very likely to happen a complete vindication on 2 of the 3 charges they were being tried for!

So this £5m show trial has a scapegoat BUT the person found guilty of the first act is likely never to have to face any further criminal proceedings on 2 other very important & serious charges.

So the media have their sacrificial lamb but he won’t be sacrificed in the usual way he is likely to limp around the field with one of those little wheelchair harnesses for his back legs! So no likely he’ll face no prison time due to the actions of a former employer! Hack on Tag – possibly a new column in the Phoenix from the ashes “News Of The World”!

All of this sorry & distasteful costly trial could have been better used to get rid of the Under Occupancy Charge, sanctions on disabled people, big families caught in benefit cap (it shouldn’t have been retrospective as the children already exist & they will be the ones to suffer) and/or any manner of things. It would also have been better remaining, for the most part, in the Budget for Criminal Justice or better known as Legal Aid. So many people now do not qualify & are unrepresented in court! As happened to an octogenarian accused of murder in the past few weeks!

so much for the great work done by Garrow a few centuries ago which instead of assisting the accused to fight their case; it appears now to be sadly returning to the style of justice often portrayed in period dramas.

Sorry about that side step, as you regular readers will no doubt know I am a bit of an Anorak on certain things.

Back to the ex-employee of extremely high standing who could have possibly used his contacts or lists of who is who to seek out information which may or may not have allowed them access to the personal telephone number of others working in the same “Mother of All P_R_I_M_N_T’s” (bit of an easy crossword to break up the monotony of Sudoku – play on again now) whom they could hack then more easily? It’s possible, don’t you think??

Now back to our very prominent person, whom is disliked in all of the EU countries including the UK. Yesterday he knowingly gave an interview about how he had been taken in by this Swiss Tony of Fleet Street, given him a 2nd chance (wasn’t aware he’d been previously been caught, cautioned or indeed prosecuted when asked to do the job he did inside 10 Downing Street). It shows such people & an associated agencies (Not in an outside manner) in their true colours!

However, this interview has basically been given and has thus automatically has scuppered any chance of getting a “fair trial”! Or indeed a retrial! Funny how things pan out when your sibling is the Counsel for one of the accused, one could jump to conclusions of words possibly said over Sunday Lunch but we wouldn’t do such a thing because we mere functionaries and taxpayers wouldn’t dare think such a thing and if we did we know better than to comment.

I shall leave you to the inevitable media scrum or three to make your own views. For this is my mere 2p’s worth and no doubt some will likely reply saying it’s not worth tuppence, I take such “constructive criticism” with the pinch of salt each deserves by the rate of salt collection I dare say will keep my path free of snow for a while in the winter months.

20140626-074846-28126808.jpg

20140626-074847-28127046.jpg

20140626-074847-28127128.jpg

20140626-074901-28141845.jpg

20140626-074901-28141750.jpg

20140626-074902-28142001.jpg

20140626-074901-28141927.jpg

Advertisements

PayPal Scam – Please Share

Just received this supposedly from PayPal – it’s a scam. Luckily my firewall protected me so I had time to check into it.

I don’t use or have Skype so was very suspicious. If you receive the following, report it as phishing e-mail & do not give your details; they don’t even have PayPal as it should appear there is a space between the Pay and the Pal: see below;

You sent a payment of 44.99 GBP to Skype (support@skype.com)
Merchant
Skype
support@skype.com
Instructions to merchant
You haven’t entered any instructions.
Shipping address – Unconfirmed
United Kingdom
Postage details
The seller hasn’t provided any postage details yet.
Description Unit price Qty Amount
Online Number, 3 month subscription
44.99 GBP 1 44.99 GBP
Subtotal 44.99 GBP
Total 44.99 GBP

If you haven’t authorized this charge, open a dispute at:
https://www.paypal.com/Dispute_Centre/webscr?cmd=xpt

Please share this so others don’t get stung.

Thanks

20140512-105957.jpg

20140512-110004.jpg

20140512-110010.jpg

20140512-110015.jpg

20140512-110024.jpg

20140512-110031.jpg

Tory Mayor likens Rape to a New Housing Development

This week my attention has been drawn to a number of examples where elected #Conservative Cllrs and Mayors have said things that are ridiculous, offensive & obviously haven’t a clue nor a care for the people who elected them;

Case Number 1

http://www.westerndailypress.co.uk/Cheltenham-councillor-apologises-rape-comment/story-20949337-detail/story.htmlhttp://www.westerndailypress.co.uk/Cheltenham-councillor-apologises-rape-comment/story-20949337-detail/story.html

Now how can any housing development be compared to rape? How can it be right for her to say that during a rape that a person should lie back & wait ’til it’s over!

The two are not any thing I can see are related. I would never countenance any person to lie back & wait ’til it’s over if they were (and I would never wish this vile act on any person) raped.

Each rape happens differently but I think the best thing is to think sensible & ensure that if in this diabolical situation would be to attempt to get DNA under your nails, pull hair, save any evidence at all and no matter how violated you feel, however much you want to scrub yourself down with bleach & a scrubbing brush, DON’T!!!!

It’s very difficult & you may feel you wish to pretend it didn’t happen, you may think it was your fault, you may feel ashamed at what has happened to you BUT please please GO STRAIGHT TO THE POLICE Or Rape Crisis Centre.

You will be believed, you will be helped, you will be supported. You may have all the evidence on you at that time which would secure a prosecution.

So I’m confounded how any person could liken a housing development to a rape. Let alone someone who is elected to represent the people and holds a high profile role in the area.

If this had been any elected or candidate of #UKIP then the media would be baying at the Council House Door, at the persons home, checking their life history etc etc

Alas for the people of Cheltenham this will not happen and many possibly will never know about this comment! Quite sad really because the media should treat all parties equally, without bias, without favour but that’s obviously only going to happen in a parallel universe.

Just remember when she is up for re-election & think if you really want someone who advocates that a person lays back and waits ’til it’s over when subjected to the violation of rape.

Hapless Harriet and the Regretful Vile PIE

What a week it has been for poor old right on doogooder & professional moaner #HarrietHarman and it’s ONLY Tuesday!

From the Guardian

Well even the usual left wing supporting newspapers and now at last the Main 24 hour News channels are running this every 15 minutes or so. The terrestrial channels BBC, ITV, C4 and C5.

The interviews Ms Harman has consented to have been completely compelling because of her ridiculously regrettable rhetoric. As ever she has fallen into her well versed but her completely and utterly inappropriate diversion tactics clone mantra speak where the answer to every question is what she has attempted to practice. She could only regret this or that, she could only say that #PIE never affected any of her work at the #NCCL. Sorry Harriet it’s NOT working, how about the truth? I know it’s not something that comes easy to you but if you continue on this path it will heavily backfire.

Oooops it’s far to late it is backfiring spectacularly, I expect to see many more documents dredged from the Archives with your name on them.

I will now post a few articles from the media do read them.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2568232/Harman-Hewitt-never-tried-kick-didnt-want-rock-boat-protect-careers-claims-child-abuser-ex-leader-Paedophile-Information-Exchange.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2567329/Call-apology-Harriet-Harman-Labours-deputy-leader-expresses-regret-civil-liberties-groups-links-paedophile-lobby.html

There’s no crusade Tom Watson MP won’t join especially if standing against something will win him votes! scoundrel

http://twitter.com/star_pumpkin/status/438481806841905152/photo/1

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/25/harriet-harman-daily-mail-smear-inept

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26333558

https://twitter.com/liz727/status/438475514928709633

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/harriet-harman-pie-nccl-controversy-what-was-paedophile-information-exchange-1437862

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10659100/Harriet-Harman-Jack-Dromey-Patricia-Hewitt-and-the-Paedophile-Information-Exchange.html

The Telegraph
Tom O’Carroll, PIE’s founder and described as a “sexually predatory” paedophile, was put one of the Council’s working groups, and in spring 1977 he was allowed to make a speech at the Council’s spring conference. During this period, the Council stepped in to defend paedophiles against “hysterical and inaccurate” newspaper attacks. One leaflet sent by PIE to MPs claimed: “Paedophiles are ordinary, decent, sensible human beings, no more sexually depraved than yourself, and with a capacity for loving and helping children which is at present being repressed.” The organisation also submitted a report to MPs claiming that “girls as young as four months can achieve orgasm”, and that four-year-old children can “communicate verbally their consent to sex”.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26320942

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/harriet-harman-fails-to-answer-charges-over-historic-involvement-in-paedophile-rights-campaigns-according-to-daily-mail-9150429.html

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/labour-partys-paedogeddon-theyre-never-3182595j

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10661251/New-evidence-casts-doubt-on-Harriet-Harmans-defence-over-paedophile-links.html

This is a very serious issue, if the officers of any group cannot or do not expel affiliate groups then one can only say they acted in concert with each other!

Their silence by way of not reporting self confessed Paedophiles to the police is implying acceptance of the groups objectives.

Footage from the late 1970’s shown on #Newsnight shows that the people were aware of what #PIE where all about because there were demonstrations, name calling & shouting at the known paedophiles so if the public knew then Dromey, Harman, Hewitt knew.

Let’s see what happens in the next 24 hours. I cannot understand why Ed Miliband has publicly supported her in this.

It says to me they will turn a blind eye to extreme and vile views if it suits their ends but will scream from the rooftops demanding select committees, transparency, answers, why was it allowed to happen. It seems that it’s your turn to explain yourselves as to WHY you did not expel #PIE or indeed why in 1975 they were allowed to become affiliate members?

Is this all tied up with Operation Yewtree? If not why not?

I hope the people will look at all the reports & evidence to decide what they believe or don’t believe about this issue.

20140226-021308.jpg

20140226-021322.jpg

20140226-021330.jpg

20140226-021338.jpg

20140226-021347.jpg

20140226-021400.jpg

20140226-021413.jpg

20140226-021435.jpg

Senior Labour MP’s In Paedophile Information Exchange Row

In the past couple of days there has been number stories in the Daily Mail, front page and then more on the inner pages today. It has also been on the Website of Guido Fawkes regarding Labour Party Grandees Harman, Dromey and Hewitt who have been involved since the 1970’s with campaigns to reduce the age of consent amongst other things.

It has not gone unnoticed that these are the only media outlets to be bringing this vital and important information to the people. How can any person let alone MP’s campaign and condone the actions of #predatoryPaedophiles or actively campaign for the age of consent to be brought down to 14?

Not one mention on BBC, ITV, C4, C5, Sky etc live news programmes. How can a Cllrs odd views on flooding be more newsworthy than Three of #Labour’s Front Benchers being involved in campaigning to reduce the age of consent?

The BBC on 24th February reported this matter and Newsnight did a rather good interview in which Ms Harman did her best to deflect any responsibility for her hand in the affiliates of the NCCL. I do expect more news coverage in the coming days and weeks. It is not any form of smear campaign or witch hunt it is the truth & it is for this reason that Ms Harman et al will not be bringing an libel actions on any media outlet

As recently as 2009 #Harman was proposing a reduction in the age of consent to 14. She had worked for the NCCL in the late 1970’s for a good 3 or 4 years as their Legal Advisor! She Lobbied politicians and campaigned for rights of Paedophiles. Some of the campaigns were so stomach churning I am not going to detail them here but have attached a lot of the links I found in a few minutes and I would urge you to read the reports yourself.

As a mother of a daughter I am appalled, as the mother of sons I am appalled, as a human being I am appalled, as the child who was sexually abused I am scared.

I am appalled, sickened, upset, angry and incandescent with rage, that anyone could ever countenance there ever being a time when it would ever be appropriate for an adult to have have any form of SEXUAL CONTACT WITH A CHILD!

Did Aiden lie & lie again about Nazi Stag Party?

20140126-012520.jpg

Photo courtesy of @GuidoFawkes

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2545976/Lies-Nazi-shame-Tory-MP-Aidan-Burley-told-inquiry-NOT-pub-revellers-chanted-Hitler-Hitler-despite-MoS-expos-Heres-proof-lied.html”>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2545976/Lies-Nazi-shame-Tory-MP-Aidan-Burley-told-inquiry-NOT-pub-revellers-chanted-Hitler-Hitler-despite-MoS-expos-Heres-proof-lied.

*****************************************************************************************************************
This row over this stag do has rumbled on for 2 years. I was called by a radio station earlier in the week to discuss whether wearing the outfit hired by #AidenBurleyMP, was Aiden’s responsibility, was it just jolly japes at a jolly boys stag party? Is it any different to people who reenact wars ranging from Knights jousting, civil war reenactments with Roundheads and Cavaliers, or the WWII themed days at various places in England?

I honestly had no idea that Aiden Burley’s friend had been prosecuted in France for wearing the offending article of clothing. I can see it being a really stupid idea to wear anything relating to the vile acts perpetrated by those who did the bidding of their reich masters. I don’t buy the following orders tale or I didn’t until I found out more about the Nazis, how they became and the rise to power of the most vile and murderous monster Adolph Hitler but that is another story altogether.

Mr Burley for some reason thought it would be “funny” to have the Groom dressed and paraded around the Ski resort. Their antics in the restaurant and the obvious disbelief of passers by as they walked to the Frog and Roastbeef pub. Mr Burley had always claimed that he did not partake in any of the chants, the salutes, the gestures, in fact he said he didn’t even of to the pub.

Now whatever the whys and wherefores of the uniform and the chanting, which is not something I would find entertaining or even fun. Mr Burley has lied to Parliament, he has lied to an enquiry. He may be a good MP, he may help his constituents resolve problems, he may work harder than any other MP BUT is he a fit and proper person?

If he can lie about this matter then what sort of a man is he? He is in a position of trust, he is meant to uphold certain standards, the above expose (link at top) would suggest he is a liar. He simply has been hoist by his own petard. His silly and irresponsible behaviour (as an elected MP he should have known better?).

His friend has been found guilty this week, so I can see why the whole sorry episode is back in the news. The information the Media had was most likely not released until the outcome of the case regarding the groom who stupidly wore the outfit.

So all of this hinges on Mr Burley’s statement of account regarding that now infamous evening, to the #ConservativeParty, The Inquiry and to #LordGold. The information, the audio, the photos are now available, it appears Mr Burley decided to lie, he didn’t then change his version of events, he was in too deep. So instead of coming clean at the time and saying sorry, he continued with his lies and possibly hoped the whole thing had gone away. I know I thought it had but with this new information questions must be asked!

I think for many reasons that uniform is divisive, there area people alive who were tortured in those hell camps, there are people who have lost loved ones in those camps. The vast majority of those sent to the death camps were sadly sent there for the sole reason that they were Jewish, that was racism of the most vile degree, 6 million Jews killed. Then there were journalists who didn’t do as they were told, actors, actresses, musicians, gypsy folk, homosexual men and the disabled.

This is a very emotive and sickeningly callous act of stupidity on the part of all who were at that party. However, the lies about his whereabouts, his lies about the chants, his lies about the intimidation of people really means that the whip should be withdrawn from Mr Burley immediately.

A further inquiry with the evidence presented by journalists being duly viewed to show the truth if the happenings of that evening, if after all that the inquiry finds he has lied to them and the House of Commons for two years then there is no other option open to the Conservatives but to force him to resign and to call a by election as soon as possible,

The people of Cannock Chase cannot and should not be represented by a liar, When will the elected understand that people do not like liars? Lies are the main reason people are so disillusioned with politicians, they have lied to the people far too often, it has to stop.

We need honesty in politics and without that sadly nothing will change,

I have to point out also that #Labour are not innocent in such matters relating to Nazis; albeit their elected representatives haven’t to my knowledge lied about it. Ed Balls Shadow Chancellor went to a fancy dress party at university actually wearing a Nazi Uniform (see photo) he also forgot to tell everyone he used to be a Tory!!!! Labour also have a councillor elected in 2012 who was a member of the Nazi party (click link below and see photo of her with Diane Abbot.

However it seems only Mr Burley has repeatedly lied.

http://www.miltonkeynes.co.uk/news/local/former-nazi-wins-a-labour-council-seat-1-3826439

20140126-013507.jpg

20140126-013525.jpg

20140126-013534.jpg